Reading is alive and well.

I spent a large part of this past weekend at the bookstore getting some last-minute Christmas shopping done. Although not as crammed as, say, Toys-r-Us (that was another nightmare entirely), it was relatively full of people, young, old, and every age in between. There were teens sprawled on the floor reading, several young kids, my daughter included, listening to an employee read to them, and hundreds of others browsing the shelves.

As I stood in line I started thinking about the state of reading in our culture. As a teacher, I sometimes get the sense that reading is becoming a lost art, but then I got to thinking about several books and essays that I had recently read, and things seemed just a little less grim.

A few weeks back, I wrote a post about Pierre Bayard’s book How to Talk About Books You Haven’t Read, and in that post I included a link to the New York Library’s talk with both Bayard and Eco (who is mentioned often in the book, and who, if you watched the exchange, had quite a lot to say).

Here is a short video excerpt (you should watch this, it’s very funny)  about “how school helps us not to read books.” What an interesting way to look at the role that a formal education plays in our lives as readers. According to eco,  school allows us to develop a context in which to understand books and their authors, whether or not we have even read said books.

Considering the number of books published in the world and the process of the evolution of mankind the lifespan of a single person is not enough read all of them. So we speak about a book we have not read. Okay. And at the school we study history of American literature, history of French literature, which means to be informed about books that we have not read and that we shall never, never, read!

But before the controversy begins, and before I stray too far from my intended point, Eco does not at all intend for us not to read, nor, for that matter, does he imply that reading is an endangered species. In fact, at the start of that same interview (not in the excerpt, but you can see it in the complete version), Paul Holdengräber quotes Eco,

“Every season,” he [Eco] told me, “there is an article on the end of the novel, the end of literature, the end of literacy. The fact of the matter is, there are thousands of stores full of books and full of young people all over the world, and never, in the history of mankind, have there been so many books, so many places selling books, so many young people visiting these places, and so many people buying the books.”

At least according to Eco, not only are books and reading not “endangered,” they are more prevalent than ever before.

My local bookstore, Books and Books

On that note, last week, Farjad Manjoo over at Slate  wrote quite a controversial article titled “Don’t Support Your Local Bookseller.” Manjoo’s basic argument is essentially that if our goal is to foster a society of readers, who better to do it than an entity like Amazon, who can efficiently, affordably, consistently, and quickly (instantly with Kindle) get people reading. Local independent booksellers, despite their “mythical” status in fomenting literary culture, actually do comparatively little in getting books into people’s hands. According to Manjoo,

As much as I despise some of its recent tactics, no company in recent years has done more than Amazon to ignite a national passion for buying, reading, and even writing new books.  . . .But if you’re a novelist—not to mention a reader, a book publisher, or anyone else who cares about a vibrant book industry—you should thank him (Bezos) for crushing that precious indie on the corner.

I have to admit that I felt quite uncomfortable reading, and reluctantly and partially agreeing with the Slate article. I do love the idea of walking into a bookstore, with its smell of old books and coffee, plenty of invited authors, and book groups meeting regularly. But that’s exactly the myth of the independent bookseller that Manjoo warns us against. Yes, its difficult to let go of our romanticized notions of what exactly a “literary culture” is, but if we can all agree that at the core of its definition lies the basic fact that people must read, then its difficult to argue against him.

So, sure, Amazon doesn’t host readings and it doesn’t give you a poofy couch to sit on while you peruse the latest best-sellers. But what it does do—allow people to buy books anytime they want—is hardly killing literary culture. In fact, it’s probably the only thing saving it.

Like I said, I love my local bookstores (although I live in Miami, and they are few and far between), but when its time to buy books, more often than not, I buy through Amazon. I probably order on average two to three books a week, not including the kindle downloads, and I have been buying from them since they launched in 1995. Will I stop visiting my local, independent bookstores as a result? Absolutely not.

I’ve strayed far from my original point again. The thing is this, much like with the e-reader vs. “real book” debate, I find that this doesn’t have to be a question of mutual exclusivity. Both play an important role (in different ways for different individuals and communities, to be sure) in our literary lives, and will surely continue to do so. As Eco stated at the start of that interview, the important thing is that people are reading, and now more than ever before. Whatever way they prefer to access their books (library, kindle, independent bookstore, Barnes & Noble, Amazon, etc), seems almost trivial. Just as there’s room in a reader’s life for both the Kindle and the book, there is certainly not only space, but a distinct purpose, for both Amazon and the independent bookstore, and I don’t really see that changing any time soon.

Advertisements

13 thoughts on “Reading is alive and well.

  1. I love to go to the bookstore to buy the books
    it’s hard to believe that one day the e-books replace the real books,
    It’s feel touch when we start to read and write,
    It’s very fotunately that we can read and write,
    from now and forever

    • At least for me, reading is a tactile, auditory, olfactory, visual experience. The only thing I can read on my kindle is throw-away fiction (I’m talking True Blood, etc). For anything with any depth I need paper, the feel and smell of the page. I even love used books (which I buy whenever I can)… something about the thought of someone before me having held and read the book, the odd note scribbled on the margin, holds a bit of magic for me. I don’t think the e-book will ever fully replace the real book.

      • Let’s not forget that Kindles and Nooks, or the applications running on your computer, actually allow access to thousands of classical books that aren’t easy to find, even in the dustiest of used bookstores. I use the applications (or my iPad) mostly to read books I could only get in digital form from sites like Project Gutenberg. One online group I frequent is reading the entire Comédie Humaine by Balzac; not even considering the cost, you might search through used bookstores, online and on the street, for years before you corralled all the novels and stories in that series.

        You say that you don’t think ebooks will ever replace real books but in a capitalist world, only books that make a profit for the publishers are making it to market. I see the digital book and organizations such as Project Gutenberg as being the savior of the printed book. True, there is a reasonably large catalogue of books that may always be in print but there are uncountable books that aren’t going to be around once the paper disintegrates. Digital books will give them life again, even if you and I do prefer the tactile pleasure of musty old paper and marginalia from the lives of previous readers that may now be only a memory.

        http://mdparker46.com

  2. Amazon and other online retailers are sometimes better for buying books you know you want. Physical bookstores are better for finding books you didn’t know, or didn’t remember, that you wanted. Finding the right bookstore (one where you and the store’s buyers have compatible tastes) is like finding that perfect pair of shoes. But even the “wrong” bookstore can be interesting, too, in that it broadens your possibilities.

    Anyway. I think the bookstores that will do the best will be the ones that manage to build up some kind of community around them — something the big places like Borders couldn’t really manage. Specialty bookstores (mystery bookshops, horror bookshops) might have an advantage here, since everyone in the store, customers and employees alike, by definition have a common (or at least common-ish) interest.

    • I completely agree on all points. Although I use Amazon for the bulk of my book-buying, I still regularly go to bookstores. Specially with my daughters. All of her books we buy at actual, physical shops. Although one thing I failed to mention in the post about amazon, is that through amazon I get to buy from independent retailers around the country… its how I always find all the used books that I love so much. Independent booksellers that I would never, under normal circumstances, be able to patronize…

  3. Pingback: Calvino on Bookstores | Intelligent Life

  4. First it was the buggy whip, then the Desoto, then the vinyl record, then learning to tell time, then the paper book, and then cursive writing … but will internet porn ever replace sex?

    (Actually, I have an old worn-out riding crop from my more active days on horseback, I drive a Toyota van, I threw away all my vinyl records when I moved back to the South, I can still tell time and even have one analog clock prominently displayed in my living room, my little house is groaning on its foundation trying to hold all the books I have on shelves and stacked around, I still write with a fountain pen despite this computer thing I’m looking at now, and they have porn on the internet?)

    http://mdparker46.com

  5. Pingback: It’s small, but it has a nice personality « Multo (Ghost)

  6. “There are thousands of stores full of books and full of young people all over the world, and never, in the history of mankind, have there been so many books, so many places selling books, so many young people visiting these places, and so many people buying the books.”

    It’s ironic though, because it seems to me people buy books just as much as ever, but I’m not sure they are really being read. A scary majority of the young people I know rarely read books for a class, let alone for pleasure, yet they own a kindle, and will spend time in the bookstores buying merchandise and whatnot. It seems we are developing a “literature culture” of people who barely read at all. This is all my personal experience. Of course there are people who still love reading, who are true bibliophiles, but I’d be lying if I said I didn’t see the numbers shrinking. And most statistics show the same.

    • You know, as someone who deals with teenagers on a regular basis, I feel much the same way. It seems as if they simply aren’t reading. But then again, they do have their kindles, talk about Twilight incessantly, so they’re reading something…

      But that’s an interesting point about creating a new literary culture of people who aren’t really readers. That’s certainly something to think about…

  7. Pingback: A Million Reasons to Read a Book | Intelligent Life

  8. Pingback: Umberto Eco: “How school teaches us not read books” « BLT

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s